Rehabilitation or Retribution? Essay

The expectations of family for the criminal nicety organization ar to punish and restore individuals who soak up relegateted iniquity. Punishment and replenishment are two acknowledged objectives of the criminal justice system, Retri barelyion, which is based on an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth philosophy, exclusively means penalization and vengeance for what evils shed done. While replenishment, as Nicholas topaz (1999) noned that is the idea of bent an offender of his or her criminal tendencies, of ever-changing their habits, their outlook and possibly even personality, so as to make them less habituated to file crimes in the future, the principal(prenominal)(prenominal) put of replenishment is to help prison houseers to sustain roughly skills in prison, so that when they re-enter into society, they can adapt quickly to the tender environment.Debates over these two nonions have lasted for a long time, many would argue that the main invention of pris on systems is to punish hatful who have committed criminals. While this should be the secondary function of prisons, the most big function should be rehabilitating criminals back to the society, non just retribution. As a young survey rendered that over 60 percent respondents agreed that prison should reform prisoners, or else than punish them (Human Rights and Justice Studies, 2000). In this essay, it go forth argue that rehabilitation is a much efficient way to help prisoners or else than retribution by illustrating advantages of rehabilitation.Some theorists end-to-end history have argued that the primary purpose of prisons is to punish criminals for what they have done, criminals should get punished when they break the law. When they are sent into prisons, as penalization, they certainly do non have rights to watch TV, access to inter terminal and so on. However, some people whitethorn disaccord with this, because going into prison is already a penalization, cr iminals have already lost their freedom, they should non suffer extra penalty by being denied other human rights musical composition in prison.After any, punishment is non the ultimate goal of prisons, redemption from sliminess is the basic aim of prisons. The root of all crime is due to the lack of reproduction and training, if prisons preventoffenders from receiving schooling or information information from outside, then by and by released, they may feel alienated from society and non be accepted by society, and employers result not employ those who do not have knowledge or telephone line skills which go out deteriorate the situation of recidivism. Therefore, rehabilitation should be the main purpose of prisons, for it call downs the humanizing persuasion in the notion that offenders can be saved and not simply punished (Nicholas. T.,1999).However, some people are hydrophobic that if allow prisoners to receive education or access to internet may append an environ ment to make better criminals. Whereas Dr capital of Minnesota Fauteck (2006) argued that the prison education programs are not coddling criminals, society in general benefits from prison education programs. The basic aim of receiving education in prisons is to help them reintegrate and rehabilitate into society, so that they will not be alienated from society.Receiving education in prisons does not necessarily suggest prisoners will commit high technological crime by and by they get released, in other words, the possibilities for offenders to commit high technological crime after they receive prison education are quite remote, after all, in some cases, prisoners can be educated to run into why their actions were wrong, and be allowed back into sane society with the possibility of positively effecting society (Wikia, Inc., 2007). Contrarily, if prisons do not brook educational materials, then the possibilities for recidivism will be truly great because of the rejection of socie ty.While some dissenters question that rehabilitation is not efficient on helping criminals, because statistics have shown that to a greater extent than fractional criminals got rearrested after they released about two or three years. In fact, criminal rehabilitation works to subjugate recidivism, it is a apostrophize efficient form of crime streak (capital of Minnesota. F, 2006). For example, some medicine could work to curative some offenders, and indeed, the most recent studies show that they do work. Such programs include pro-social model programmes, and some sex-offender treatment programs.This research demonst place that the net effect of treatment is, on average, a positive reduction of overall recidivism (re-offending) rates of between 10% and 12%, which would promote a reduction in crime (Nicholas.T., 1999). From thisperspective, it is easy to say that rehabilitation helps to reduce the rate of recidivism, if prisons do not provide these treatments or knowledge, then nothing will ever change. Moreover, rehabilitation can similarly help them to realize that being in prisons are disastrous which is a hefty way to stop them re-entering into prisons.Yet, rehabilitation and punishment are mutually exclusive goals, but they become more and more structured in young society, since the late eighteenth century prisons have combined elements of punishment with elements of rehabilitation. As the French philosopher Michel Foucault put it, punishment shifted over time from the disciplining of the body to the disciplining of the disposition (Politics.co.uk, 2007). Therefore, incarceration sentences should provide for a raise term of rehabilitation followed by a set term of punishment. Furthermore, rehabilitation and rehabilitation are both important, they should work unneurotic to punish and change criminals.To sum up, retribution theory focus more simply on punishment which is very barbaric, and it should not be encouraged in modern society. While the notion of rehabilitation is more humanism and flexible, it can help prisoners by providing education and trainings, so the true aim of prison systems should rehabilitate and reform criminals, not simply punish them.REFERENCES_Crime_ (2007), cited from http//campaigns.wikia.com/wiki/CrimeNicholas Tan (1999), _Rehabilitation vs Retribution_, cited from international debate education association, http//www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=307Paul Fauteck (2002-2006), Criminal rehabilitation-criminal recidivism rates, cited from http//www.going-straight.com/